|
|
|
Effective Date: 04/01/2012 |
Title: Extracorporeal Photopheresis
|
Revision Date: 10/01/2015
|
Document: BI343:00
|
CPT Code(s): 36522
|
Public Statement
|
Effective Date:
a)
This policy
will apply to all services performed on or after the above revision date which
will become the new effective date.
b)
For all
services referred to in this policy that were performed before the revision
date, contact customer service for the rules that would apply.
Extracorporeal photopheresis is covered for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell
lymphoma, bronchiolitis obliterans (lung transplant rejection), acute heart
transplant rejection refractory to standard treatment, and chronic
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after a prior allogeneic stem cell transplant.
|
Medical Statement
|
1)
Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (photopheresis) is considered medically
necessary for erythrodermic variants of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (e.g., mycosis
fungoides, Sézary syndrome).
2)
Extracorporeal photochemotherapy is considered medically necessary in the
treatment of acute cardiac allograft rejection that is refractory to standard
immunosuppressive drug treatment (high-dose steroids plus 2 or more of the
following, unless contraindicated: azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate,
and/or polyclonal and monoclonal antilymphocyte agents (e.g., anti-lymphocyte
globulin (ALG), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), and OKT3 [monoclonal T-cell
antibody]).
3)
Extracorporeal photochemotherapy is considered medically necessary in the
treatment of lung transplant rejection (bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome)
4)
Extracorporeal photochemotherapy is considered medically necessary for the
treatment of graft-versus-host disease of an allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell
transplant when the disease is refractory to standard immunosuppressive drug
treatment.
Codes Used In This BI:
36522 Photopheresis
|
Limits
|
Extracorporeal photochemotherapy is considered experimental and investigational
as a treatment for the following conditions because the effectiveness of this
treatment for these diagnoses has not been established:
-
Allograft rejection of solid
organs other than the heart and lung
-
Bullous pemphigoid
-
Crohn’s disease
-
Multiple sclerosis
-
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis
(previously known as nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy)
-
Pemphigus vulgaris
-
Pityriasis rubra pilaris
-
Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)
-
Type 1 diabetes.
|
Background
|
Extracorporeal photopheresis has been shown in prospective case studies to be
effective in the treatment of T-Cell Lymphoma. Evidence suggests that it
prolongs life and induces 50-75% response rates.
The use of photopheresis as a treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)
after a prior allogeneic stem cell transplant is based on the fact that GVHD is
an immunologically mediated disease. GVHD can be categorized into acute,
occurring within the first 100 days after infusion of allogeneic cells, or
chronic disease, which develops sometime after 100 days. Acute GVHD is commonly
graded I-IV, ranging from mild disease characterized by a skin rash without
involvement of the liver or gut, to grades III and IV, which are characterized
by generalized erythroderma, elevated bilirubin levels, or diarrhea. Grade III
acute GVHD is considered severe, while Grade IV is considered threatening.
Chronic GVHD typically presents with more diverse symptomatology resembling
autoimmune diseases such a progressive systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus
erythematosus, or rheumatoid arthritis. It may affect the mouth, eyes,
respiratory tract, musculoskeletal system, peripheral nerves, as well as the
skin, liver, or gut - the usual sites of acute GVHD.
An alternating regimen of cyclosporine and prednisone are commonly used to treat
chronic GVHD. Other therapies include antithymocyte globulin, corticosteroid
monotherapy, and cytotoxic immunosuppressive drugs such as procarbazine,
cyclophosphamide, or azathioprine. Therefore, refractory disease is defined as
chronic GVHD that fails to respond adequately to a trial of any of the above
therapies.
There is no standard schedule for photopheresis therapy. However, most reported
schedules initiate therapy with 1-3 days of photopheresis at 1-3 week intervals,
followed by a tapering of therapy.
In 2006, the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC) published
results of a systematic review of ECP for the treatment of refractory chronic
GVHD. In summary, OHTAC reported that there is low quality evidence that ECP
improves response rates and survival in patients with chronic GVHD who are
unresponsive to other forms of therapy. Limitations in the literature related to
ECP for the treatment of refractory GVHD mostly pertained to the quality, size,
and heterogeneity in treatment regimens and diagnostic criteria of available
clinical studies. The Committee did, however, recommend a 2-year duration field
evaluation of ECP for chronic GVHD, using standardized inclusion criteria and
definitions to measure disease outcomes including response rates, quality of
life, and morbidity.
A
retrospective case series published in 2007 reported results of ECP for
steroid-resistant GVHD in pediatric (aged 6–18 years) patients who had undergone
hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation to treat a variety of cancers (Massimo
et al, 2007). Patients had acute GVHD (aGVHD, n=15, stages II-IV) or chronic
GVHD (cGVHD, n=10, 7 deemed extensive) that did not respond to at least 7 days
of methylprednisolone therapy. Patients received ECP on 2 consecutive days at
weekly intervals for the first month, every 2 weeks during the second and third
months, and then at monthly intervals for a further 3 months. ECP was
progressively tapered and discontinued based on individual patient response.
Response to ECP was assessed 3 months after ECP ended or after 6 months if the
ECP protocol was prolonged. Among patients with aGVHD, a CR was observed in 7 of
7 (100%) with Grade II and 2 of 4 (50%) with Grade III illness, whereas none
with Grade IV responded to ECP. In the group with cGVHD, 3 of 3 (100%) with
limited disease had CR, compared to 1 of 7 (14%) with extensive disease who had
a CR; 5 of 7 (71%) of patients with extensive cGVHD had no response to ECP.
Adverse effects of ECP were generally mild in all cases.
Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a manifestation of chronic allograft
rejection, has become the leading obstacle to long-term success in patients who
have received lung transplantation. BOS is usually an irreversible and
inexorably progressive complication that responds poorly to treatment. A
retrospective analysis published in 2010 of all patients with progressive BOS
treated at Barnes-Jewish Hospital demonstrated significant reduction in the
decline of lung function in a pre/post treatment analysis (Morrell et al 2010).
The average rate of decline of FEV1 during the six months prior to photopheresis
was 116.0 ml/month, with the slope decreasing to -28.9 ml/month during the six
months after initiation of photopheresis. The FEV1 improved in 25% of the
treated patients.
|
Reference
|
Cavaletti G, Perseghin P, Dassi M
et al.(2006) Extracorporeal photochemotherapy: a safety and tolerability pilot
study with preliminary efficacy results in refractory relapsing-remitting
multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2006; 27(1):24-32.
Cribier B, Faradji T, Le Coz C, et al.(1995) Extracorporeal photochemotherapy in
systemic sclerosis and severe morphea. Derm 1995; 191:25-31.
Enomoto DNH, Meekes JR, Bossuyt PMM, et al.(1999) Treatment of patients with
systemic sclerosis with extracorporeal photochemotherapy (photopheresis). J Am
Acad Derm 1999; 41:915-922.
Extracorporeal photopheresis for treatment of graft versus host disease or
autoimmune disease. 2001 Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Technology
Evaluation Center Assessment.
Fries JF, Seibold JR, Medsger TA.(1992) Photopheresis for scleroderma. J Rheum
1992; 19:1011-1013;.
Knobler RM, Grainger W, Grainger W, et al.(1992) Extracorporeal
photochemotherapy for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. A pilot
study. Arthrit Rheum 1992; 35:319-324.
Mayes MD.(2000) Photopheresis and autoimmune disease. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 2000;
26; 75-81.
Melski JW.(1992) Price of technology: A blind spot. JAMA 1992; 267:1516-17.
Rook AH, Freundlich B, Jegasothy BV, et al.(1992) Treatment of systemic
sclerosis with extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Results of a multicenter trial.
Arch Derm 1992; 128:337-346.
Rostami A, Sater R, Bird S, et al.(1999) A double blind, placebo controlled
trial of extracorporeal photopheresis in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis.
Multi Scler 1999; 5:198-203.
Schwwartz J, Gonzalez J, Palangio M, et al.(1997) Extracorporeal
photochemotherapy in progressive systemic sclerosis: A follow-up study. Int J
Derm 1997; 36:380-385.
Trentham DE.(1992) Photochemotherapy in systemic sclerosis. Arch Dermatol
1992;128:389-90.
Vhalquist C, Larsson M, Ernerudh J, et al.(1996) Treatment of psoriatic
arthritis with extracorporeal photo chemotherapy and conventional psoralen-ultraviolet
A irradiation. Arthrit Rheum 1996; 39:1519-1523.
Wollina U, Lange D, Looks A.(1999) Short-time extracorporeal photochemotherapy
in the treatment of drug-resistant autoimmune bullous disease. Derm 1999;
198:140-144.
Alcindor T, Gorgun G, Miller KB, et al.(2001) Immunomodulatory effects of
extracorporeal photochemotherapy in patients with extensive chronic
graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2001; 98:1622-5.
Arai S, Vogelsang GB.(2000) Management of graft-versus-host disease. Blood Rev
2000; 14:190-204.
Besnier DP, Chabannes D, Mahe B, et al.(1997) Treatment of graft-versus-host
disease by extracorporeal photochemotherapy: a pilot study. Transplantation
1997; 64:49-54.
Chao NJ, Parker PM, Niland JC, et al.(1996) Paradoxical effect of thalidomide
prophylaxis on chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
1996; 2:86-92.
Child FJ, Ratnavel R, Watkins P, et al.(1999) Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP)
in the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). BMT 1999;
23:881-7.
Dall`Amico R, Zacchello G.(1998) Treatment of graft-versus-host disease with
photopheresis. Transplantation 1998; 65:1283-4.
Extracorporeal photopheresis for treatment of graft versus host disease or
autoimmune disease. 2001 Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Technology
Evaluation Center Assessment.
FDA.(2001) FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness. www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf/p0100156.pdf;
2001.
Flowers ME, Kansu E, Sullivan KM.(1999) Pathophysiology and treatment of
graft-versus-host disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1999; 13:1091-112,
viii-ix.
Fries JF, Seibold JR, Medsger TA.(1992) Photopheresis for scleroderma? No!. J
Rheumatol 1992; 19:1011-13.
Gaziev D, Galimberti M, Lucarelli G, et al.(2000) Chronic graft-versus-host
disease: is there an alternative to the conventional treatment. BMT 2000;
25:689-96.
Greinix HT, Knobler RM, Worel N et al.(2005) Prospective study of extracorporeal
photopheresis in steroid refractory or steroid-resistant extensive chronic
graft-versus-host disease. Haematologica 2006; 91(3):405-408.
Greinix HT, Volc-Platzer B, Rabitsch W, et al.(1998) Successful use of
extracorporeal photochemotherapy in the treatment of severe acute and chronic
graft-versus-host disease. Blood 1998; 92:3098-104.
Halle P, Paillard C, D`Incan M et al.(2002) Successful extracorporeal
photochemotherapy for chronic graft versus-host disease in pediatric patients. J
Hematothera Stem Cell Res 2002; 11(3):501-512.
Hiraoka A, Ohashi Y, Okamoto S, et al.(2001) Phase III study comparing
tacrolimus (FK 506) with cyclosporine for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis
after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. BMT 2001; 28:181-5.
Knobler RM, Trautinger F, Graninger W, et al.(1993) Parenteral administration of
8-methoxypsoralen in photopheresis. J Am Acad Derm 1993; 28:580-4.
Massimo B, Rosanna P, Roberto A et al.(2007) Extracorporeal photopheresis for
steroid resistant graft-versus-host disease in pediatric patients: a pilot
single institution report. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2007; 29(10):678-687.
Melski JW.(1992) Price of technology. A blind spot. JAMA 1992; 267:1516-8.
Melski JW.(1992) Price of technology: A blind spot. JAMA 1992; 267:1516-17.
OHTAC Recommendation: Extracorporeal Photopheresis. March 28, 2006.
http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/ohtac/tech/recommend/rec_ecp_032806.pdf
Ratanatharathorn V, Ayash L, Lazarus HM, et al.(2001) Chronic graft-versus-host
disease: clinical manifestation and therapy. BMT 2001; 28:121-9.
Rook AH, Freundlich B, Jegasothy BV, et al.(1992) Treatment of systemic
sclerosis with extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Results of a multicenter trial.
Arch Derm 1992;128:337-46.
Russell-Jones R.(2001) Shedding light on photopheresis. Lancet 2001; 357:820-1.
Salvaneschi L, Perotti C, Zecca M et al.(2001) Extracorporeal photochemotherapy
for treatment of acute and chronic GVHD in childhood. Transfusion 2001;
41(10):1299-1305.
Shephard SE, Nestle FO, Panizzon R.(1999) Pharmacokinetics of 8-methoxypsoralen
during extracorporeal photopheresis. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1999;
15:64-74.
Smith EP, Sniecinski I, Dagis AC, et al.(1998) Extracorporeal photochemotherapy
for treatment of drug resistant graft vs-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow
Transplant 1998; 4:27-37.
Trentham DE.(1992) Photochemotherapy in systemic sclerosis. Arch Dermatol
1992;128:389-90.
Vogelsang GB.(2000) Advances in the treatment of graft-versus-host disease.
Leukemia 2000; 14:509-10.
Vogelsang GB.(2001) How I treat chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2001;
97:1196-201.
Wagner JL, Flowers ME, Longton G, et al.(1998) The development of chronic
graft-versus-host disease: an analysis of screening studies and the impact of
corticosteroid use at 100 days after transplantation. BMT 1998; 22:139-46.
Fraser-Andrews E, Seed P, Whittaker S, et al.(1998) Extracorporeal photopheresis
in Sézary syndrome: no significant effect in the survival of 44 patients with a
peripheral blood T cell clone. Arch Derm 1998; 134:1001-05.
Heald P, Rook A, Perez M, et al.(1992) Treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T
cell Lymphoma with extracorporeal photochemotherapy. J Am Acad Derm 1992;
27:427-433.
Lim HW, Edelson Rl.(1995) Photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell
lymphoma. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 1995; 9:1117-26.
Zackheim HS.(1999) Cutaneous T cell Lymphoma: Update of treatment. Derm 1999;
199:102-5.
Morrell MR, et al. (2010)
The Efficacy of Photopheresis for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome After Lung
Transplantation. Jnl Heart Lung Trans 2010 Apr; 29(4):424-31
|
Application to Products
|
This policy applies to all health plans administered by QualChoice, both those insured by QualChoice and those that are self-funded by the sponsoring employer, unless there is indication in this policy otherwise or a stated exclusion in your medical plan booklet. Consult the individual plan sponsor Summary Plan Description (SPD) for self-insured plans or the specific Evidence of Coverage (EOC) for those plans insured by QualChoice. In the event of a discrepancy between this policy and a self-insured customer’s SPD or the specific QualChoice EOC, the SPD or EOC, as applicable, will prevail. State and federal mandates will be followed as they apply.
|
Changes: QualChoice reserves the right to alter, amend, change or supplement benefit interpretations as needed.
|
|