|
|
|
Effective Date: 09/01/2012 |
Title: Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation (TPVI)
|
Revision Date: 08/02/2017
|
Document: BI365:00
|
CPT Code(s): 0262T
|
Public Statement
|
Effective Date:
A)
This policy
will apply to all services performed on or after the above revision date which
will become the new effective date.
B)
For all
services referred to in this policy that were performed before the revision
date, contact customer service for the rules that would apply.
1)
Transcatheter
pulmonary valve implantation requires preauthorization.
2)
This
procedure is an alternative to open heart surgery in patients with previous
repair of congenital heart disease and right ventricular outflow tract
obstruction.
|
Medical Statement
|
1)
QualChoice
considers Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation using FDA-approved devices
(e.g., Melody Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve) medically necessary in patients
with prior repair of congenital heart disease (Z87.74) for the treatment of
dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) conduits whose pulmonary
valve has become stenotic (mean RVOT gradient greater than or equal to 35 mm Hg)
or regurgitant (moderate or more severe regurgitation), where individuals
indicated for the procedure have a full circumferential RVOT conduit greater
than or equal to 16 mm in diameter when originally implanted.
2)
Any other use
of TPVI is considered experimental and investigational, and is not covered.
Codes Used in This BI:
0262T
Implantation of catheter-delivered
prosthetic pulmonary valve, endovascular
approach. (deleted 1-1-16)
33477
Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, percutaneous approach
|
Background
|
Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation received FDA approval under the
Humanitarian Device Exception program in January 2010 for patients with previous
repair of congenital heart disease and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT)
obstruction. The goal of Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, at a
minimum, is to improve the hemodynamic function of the existing conduit,
mitigate the adverse impact of pulmonary regurgitation and/or RVOT obstruction,
and extend the longevity of the existing conduit and defer the need for conduit
replacement. In some patients delaying surgical conduit re-intervention may
reduce the need for open heart surgeries required over the course of a lifetime.
There is currently a lack of high-quality evidence evaluating outcomes of this
procedure for the indicated population. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
have been performed, and there are no controlled trials that compare
Transcatheter valve implantation to available alternatives. The available
evidence consists of case series of patients with RVOT dysfunction who require
re-intervention.
The results of the case series indicate that there is a high rate of procedural
success and low procedural mortality. The rate of serious procedural adverse
events reported in these series ranges from 3.0-7.4%. At 6-12 months of
follow-up, there is evidence that the majority of valves demonstrate competent
functioning by Doppler echocardiography, with the majority of patients in NYHA
functional class I or II. Complications at six months follow-up, such as stent
fractures and the need for re-interventions, were reported by the FDA analysis
to occur at rates of 18% and 7% respectively. There is no direct evidence to
demonstrate that TPV implantation leads to a reduction in future open heart
procedures.
The Melody
U.S. Clinical Trial (n=34) was designed to evaluate the safety, procedural
success, and short-term effectiveness of the Melody Transcatheter pulmonary
valve in patients with dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tract conduits.
Early results were published by Zahn et al. (2009). Patients underwent
catheterization for intended Melody valve implantation at three centers between
January and September, 2007. The mean age was 19.4 ± 7.7 years. Doppler mean
gradient was 28.8 ± 10.1 mm Hg, and 94% of patients had moderate or severe
pulmonary regurgitation (PR). Implantation was successful in 29 of 30 attempts,
and not attempted in four patients. Complications included one conduit rupture
requiring urgent surgery and device removal, one distal pulmonary artery guide
wire perforation, and one instance of wide complex tachycardia. Peak systolic
conduit gradient fell from 37.2 ± 16.3 mm Hg to 17.3 ± 7.3 mm Hg. None of the
patients had more than mild PR. At 6-months, conduit Doppler mean gradient was
22.4± 8.1 mm Hg, and pulmonary regurgitation fraction as measured by magnetic
resonance imaging was significantly improved (3.3 ± 3.6% vs. 27.6 ± 13.3%,
p<0.0001). Stent fracture occurred in 8 of 29 implants. Three of these patients
were subsequently treated with a second Melody valve for recurrent stenosis
during follow-up. The authors concluded that implantation of the Melody valve
for RVOT conduit dysfunction can be performed by experiences operators and
appears safe, and has encouraging acute and short-term outcomes. Longer
follow-up and a larger patient experience are needed to determine the ultimate
role of this therapy in the treatment of conduit dysfunction.
McElhinney et
al. (2010) evaluated short and medium-term outcomes in the expanded Melody U.S.
Trial (n=136). Implantation was attempted in 124 patients, and was achieved
successfully in all except one. Placement was not attempted in the other 12
patients due to the risk of coronary artery compression (n=6) or other clinical
or protocol contraindications. There was one death from intracranial hemorrhage
after coronary artery dissection, and one valve was explanted after conduit
rupture. The median peak RVOT gradient was 37 mm Hg prior to implantation and 12
mm Hg immediately following implantation. Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) was
moderate or severe in 92 patients prior to implantation, and no patient had
greater than mild PR immediately after implantation or during follow-up (≥ one
year in 65 patients). Freedom from stent fracture was 77.8% ± 4.3% at 14 months,
and freedom from Melody valve dysfunction or re-intervention was 93.5 ± 2.4% at
one year. A higher RVOT gradient at discharge and younger age were associated
with shorter freedom from dysfunction.
Eiken et al.
(2011) published results of 102 consecutive percutaneous pulmonary valve
implantations performed at two centers in Germany between 2006 and 2010. The
median patient age was 21.5 years. Sixty-one patients had undergone surgical
correction of a Tetralogy of Fallot/pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal
defect, and14 had a common arterial trunk; the remaining patients had been
treated surgically for transposition of the great arteries (n=9) or aortic
stenosis (n=8), or had a variety of other cardiac lesions (n=10). The majority
of conduits (79) used during previous surgery were homograft’s. The median peak
systolic RVOT gradient between the right ventricle and the pulmonary artery
decreased immediately following the procedure from 37 mmHg (29–46 mmHg) to 14
mmHg (9–17 mmHg, p< 0.001). Pulmonary regurgitation assessed by MRI was reduced
from a median of 16% (5–26%) to 1% (0–2%, p<0.001). The median end-diastolic
RV-volume index also decreased significantly (p=0.001). One patient died due to
compression of the left coronary artery. At a median follow-up of 357 days
(99–388 days), the mean doppler gradient in the RVOT decreased from a
pre-procedure median of 36 mmHg (26–44) to a median of 15 mmHg (12–20) at the
latest follow-up (p<0.0001). The authors concluded that PPVI can be performed by
an experienced structural heart disease internationalist in patients with RVOT
dysfunction. Medium and long term follow up needs to be assessed to document
sustained benefit, however. It remains to be proved whether the improvements in
hemodynamics persist, and the goal to reduce the number of cardiothoracic
operations during the lifetime of the patient can be achieved.
The National
Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (UK) Interventional
Procedure Guidance on percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation for right
ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) dysfunction issued in 2007 states that the
evidence is limited to small numbers of patients but shows good short-term
efficacy. There is little evidence on long-term efficacy. There are no
particular safety concerns in the context of a condition that otherwise requires
open cardiac surgery. Clinicians wishing to use this procedure should do so only
with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent and for audit or
research.
|
Reference
|
Eiken A, Ewert P, Hager A, Peters B, Fratz S,
Kuehne T, et al. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: two-centre
experience with more than 100 patients. Eur Heart J. 2011 May; 32(10):1260-5.
Epub 2011 Jan 27.
U.S. Food and Drug
Administration Device Approvals and Clearances. Humanitarian Device Approval,
Medtronic Melody® Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve - H080002. Available at URL
address: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm199258.htm
McElhinney DB, Hellenbrand
WE, Zahn EM, Jones TK, Cheatham JP, Lock JE, Vincent JA. Short- and medium-term
outcomes after Transcatheter pulmonary valve placement in the expanded
multicenter US melody valve trial. Circulation. 2010 Aug 3; 122(5):507-16. Epub
2010 Jul 19.
National Institute for
Health and Clinical Excellence. Interventional procedure guidance 266.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis. UK: NICE; 2008 Jun.
Zahn EM,
Hellenbrand WE, Lock JE et al. (2009) Implantation of the Melody Transcatheter
pulmonary valve in patients with a dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tract
conduit. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54(18):1722-9.
|
Application to Products
|
This policy applies to all health plans administered by QualChoice, both those insured by QualChoice and those that are self-funded by the sponsoring employer, unless there is indication in this policy otherwise or a stated exclusion in your medical plan booklet. Consult the individual plan sponsor Summary Plan Description (SPD) for self-insured plans or the specific Evidence of Coverage (EOC) for those plans insured by QualChoice. In the event of a discrepancy between this policy and a self-insured customer’s SPD or the specific QualChoice EOC, the SPD or EOC, as applicable, will prevail. State and federal mandates will be followed as they apply.
|
Changes: QualChoice reserves the right to alter, amend, change or supplement benefit interpretations as needed.
|
|